The Da Vinci Code

Deal Score0
Deal Score0

Description
Dan Brown’s international bestseller comes alive in the film The Da Vinci Code, directed by Ron Howard with a screenplay by Akiva Goldsman. Join symbologist Robert Langdon (Academy Award® Winner Tom Hanks, 1993 Best Actor, Philadelphia, and 1994 Best Actor, Forrest Gump) and cryptologist Sophie Neveu (Audrey Tautou) in their heart-racing quest to solve a bizarre murder mystery that will take them from France to England – and behind the veil of a mysterious ancient socie… More >>

The Da Vinci Code

This site uses affiliate links and if you click on one and make a purchase we may receive a commission payment.

Tags:

5 Comments
  1. THIS MOVIE WAS BORING AS HELL AND HUGELY OVER RATED, TOM HANKS IS FLAT, AS IF HE EVER WAS THAT GREAT AN ACTOR WHEN NOT RETARDED, AND THE SUSPENSE IS NEVER FELT. IT A TRYING BORING BARF DEISGNED TO GET YOUR CASH AND HAVE LITTLE MYSTERY. I HATE WHO EVER MADE IT.
    Rating: 1 / 5

  2. Dan Brown is not what he pretends to be – a historian. What a horrible historian this world would have if he really is one! But he cliams to be one as he told ABC News Special on Nov.3, 2003 that everything in his book da Vince Code is true to history. Nothing could be further from the truth. He tried to do a really big job – to dismiss everything the world history has recorded in the last 2000 years about Jesus and claimed he is the only one telling the true story. How could be that be possible? He is not even a historian and he never studied history so much as a hobby. So isn’t that miracle this Brown all of sudden has found everyone is telling lies and he is the only person on earth telling the truth about Jesus and Christianity?

    If Brown only wrote about his own fantacy to defame Jesus and Christianity, I would not even bother to write anything here – people have always done that thru the history, even when Jesus still lived. But Brown pretended and claimed that he wrote a true historical novel! Then it is something else. Millions of people believed him that he was the only one telling the true story about Jesus and Christianity and everyone else has been telling lies. Does that sound familiar to you? The last time I have seen someone acted exactly the same way as Brown did was in a Psychiatric ward to visit someone.

    In his book, Brown either intentionally or unknowingly spread a lot of rumors and supported some pure hoax that were long proved to be nothing but lunatic fancination. Let’s take one example here: the so-called holy secrete organization, Priory of Sion, which was supposedly responsible for garding the secret of the Holy Grail since 11th century had never ever done anything like that. It was a total nonesense. In fact, the files in the French police shown that that organization, Priory of Sion never existed until 1954! And that organization had no other purpose than promoting low-cost housing in France. The man behind the Priory of Sion, Pierre Plantard, was a criminal who did time in prison for fraud in 1953. That guy cliamed that he was in the bloodline descending from Mary Magdalene and thru to the kings of France. He also produced lots of documents which were later proved by the French police as forgery. Pierre Plantard had also admitted in court that he made up the whole priory of Sion scheme.

    Anybody with any knowledge of history or any degree of seriousness in writing a decent book, would at least spend some time on research. What happened to Dan Brown, brain damage? Or is it more like there is a hiden purpose?

    Brown also promotes sex intercourse as a holy seremony for a supposedly Christian society. Dogs know better than he does. Someone call a doctor, has Brown really got brain damage? Or rather brain wash?

    I don’t want to deal with this Dan Brown. I’m out’a here. Someone call an ambulance for Dan Brown to take him to a psychaitrist.

    I am not suprised that there are people like Dan Brown wrote this kind of book which abused history to such a degree, but I am suprised that millions of people are willing to endorse such lunatic fairytales while resisting the truth that tested by history thru 2000 years.

    Why there is no church or Christian organization sue Dan Brown for lable since he cliamed that he told nothing but truth in his book? As far as I am concerned, what Brown really intended to do is to get fame and money for himself in addition to the name that he is the only person can show us that we are all cheated but he is not. Mr.Brown, how do you know you would not end up like Pierre Plantard? Or even worse.


    Rating: 1 / 5

  3. I can’t believe there are movies and books written with such lies about Jesus Christ the Son Of God! The book says that in the art of Divinci there are hidden symbols showing that Jesus Christ The Son Of God married Mary Magdalene (also who had a royal bloodline) and they had a daughter. The blood line stills runs to this day says the book. The book also claims this secret has been hidden by a group of monks in the Catholic Church for centuries and anyone who would expose this is killed. This is marked as “fiction” but it brings such confusion I don’t think any Chirstian should support this at least not opening week…..go see another new film opening week and lets see Davinci go below the Top ten. I dont want it to be number one. If there was a film made about Hitler and he was portrayed a saint would it sit well with the jews? I dont think so….so why should this movie sit well with Christians? If Jesus married Mary Magadelene like this book & movie claims He is basically a dead rabbi and not God’s Son is this the kind of lies we want to see portrayed??? I don’t think I do. Im surprised that Ron Howard would do this kind of film. in my opinion If “Aunt Bee” knew “Opie” would do this she’d roll over!!
    Rating: 1 / 5

  4. This looked like a great mystery kinda like “National Treasure” but I was very disapointed. The movie constantly paints Christians as evil-doers. I was offended at the repeated — and distracting! — illustrations of the writer’s anti-Christian bias.

    A freakish monk/homicidal-escapee from a mental institution is made out to respresent the traditional view of Christ and is –for no discernable reason — goinging around killing people who are either the un-provable decendents of Christ or someone “who knows to much” like our Hero Tom Hanks.

    I just didn’t get it. Why kill off the decendents after thousands of years? Who would know? Can any of them walk on water? Where is the plot? Is this it?

    Not one Christian is a good person in this movie. They are all killing people or skulking around dark old buildings spying and plotting to keep the supposed fact that Christ was just a nice man, not the savior, secret from Christian followers.

    The Nun killed off in the begining was absolutely senseless violence and is no more than a shock-value trick. A Bishop is made out to be a mobster just like Al Capone which I guess is the writer’s view of all leaders of organized religion.

    I walked out of this theater twice before the movie was over. The first time I went to my car to get a sweater as they had the AC on overdrive. The next time I left, not even half way through the movie, was to go home.

    The last movie I walked out on was Ishtar (1987) staring Dustin Hoffman.

    My Mom reads books in mostly two days. She said this book was very hard for her follow and it took about a week. She didn’t think it was a very good story either but she didn’t find a bias against Christians like I did.

    Its to late for me, my nine dollars are gone but you can still save yourself 6 bucks. Don’t rent it, wait for it to come on cable.

    No one should not have to pay to see a movie that sucks!
    Rating: 1 / 5

  5. Just as the book was reading for non-readers this is viewing for non-movie goers. Rubbish.
    Rating: 1 / 5

Leave a reply

Login/Register access is temporary disabled